Dude, who even knows.
Post with 6 notes
Transportation for an infrastructure push is really ideal to build up Mayor Pete’s experience at overseeing federal programs and particularly the executive-bureaucratic nexus between Congressional spending and end-recipients that touches on both the administrative and political angles; the Dem national bench was getting pretty thin and I think being selected for development to fill it is a fitting outcome of his primary performance.
Question with 2 notes
Anonymous asked:
the compromise position is that it's ok to objectify female politicians but you have to objectify an equal number of male politicians to balance it out. not sure who the best prospects there are
Yeah, Pete Buttegieg definitely pulling “gay appeal” in the “now that gay marriage is legal he can be the man your mom wishes you gay married” sense
Post with 84 notes
Pete Buttigieg… more than anything he seems unseasoned. Which is the criticism! He’s a 38-year-old who mayored a third-tier city, there are more steps on the cursus honorum yet to go. An intermediate elected position would broaden his horizons – the types and scale of constituencies to service, the allies to articulate with, his donor and support base…
But is there any intermediate position open to him? Mid-century the best out-party talent in Indiana would have a shot at governor or senate but partisanship is too firm now and it’s a red state. Should he use his run as an “audition” for cabinet or VP? If he’d spent 4 years building up chits he could maybe get Veterans Affairs. Julian Castro made sense as a ticket-balancer but who would Pete balance, a coastal minority straight woman? Stacey Abrams isn’t even running, and he’d have to be more established labor-y to balance Harris.
People like “why didn’t Cory Booker get a look this cycle” and it’s cause people know who Cory Booker is, he’s been in the mix a while, nothing new, and they know national level that’s not enough. But that’s cause Cory Booker is close to the limits of how crossover you can get as an elected official in a blue state - he’s cool with urban neoliberalism! He’d be a good committee head someday but the Gingrich reforms weakened the impact of that.
But maybe it’s not a Dem thing but a post-Boomer thing. JFK was elected youngest at 43, but that was with a dynastic machine behind him, blood a more direct form of inheritance than neo-establishmentarians Humphrey and Nixon, who still had to devote energy to holding things together.
Oldest elected was Donald Trump. In California, with one governor, two senators, and a term-limited “up or out” legislature for 40 million people, it’s a traffic jam at the top and increasingly the middle as the Boomers just refuse to relinquish power.
Maybe that’s the thing, not so much that Pete’s a red state Dem as a post-Boomer, experiencing the same thing as us all in bumping up against an entrenched leadership that petulantly refuses to die like proper olds.
Maybe we’re experiencing a shift from a 3-simultaneous-generation to a 4-simultaneous world. Maybe that will require either patience or parricidical initiative or both.
Anyway to repeat, this is part of why I endorse Bernie Sanders for the Democratic nomination