Dude, who even knows.
Question reblogged from argumate with 21 notes
open-road-air asked:
Not a lawyer, but iirc the American interpretation of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition, a contract is created by ~two elements: a "meeting of the minds" (i.e., mutual understanding about the terms of an agreement) and an "exchange of valuable consideration" (i.e., an agreement is only a contract if it involves swapping things of value). Some quick googling suggests that the stuff I've bundled under "meeting" might be disaggregated but w/e. Paper doesn't matter! Signatures don't count!
right, if paper and signatures were vital to the magic ritual then we wouldn’t be able to use apps for stuff
This is why bullshit unilateral “we agree to do this” contracts and deals will formally be in exchange for $1, to make them legally valid and binding. Scots law, at least, recognizes binding unilateral “promises” without this requirement, I was looking forward to seeing that come up somehow if Scotland became independent.
fvckw4d liked this
alkatyn-castle liked this
hieronymus-botch reblogged this from infraredarmy
hieronymus-botch liked this
sorrowlessfield liked this
infraredarmy reblogged this from kontextmaschine
infraredarmy liked this This is why bullshit unilateral "we agree to do this" contracts and deals will formally be in exchange for $1, to make...
Not a lawyer, but iirc the American interpretation of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition, a contract is created by ~two...