I... Don't think this is a very good take.

Obviously it doesn't prove you are a woman, the whole issue is a disputed definition in the first place.

But it doesn't prove the opposite either. Honestly, the whole matter stinks of "chadwashing" which is used to justify an attitude that is sometimes indistinguishable from cruelty - why is "male power, privilege, and entitlement", in either the individual or general case, being taken for granted here?

I love how feminism is completely unable to remember what it did a few decades back.

This could pretty much be an '80s second-waver take without changing a word, Transsexual Empire was published in 1979.

My point is that second wave was very industriously "getting laws changed and forcing their way into male spaces and categories".