Dude, who even knows.
Post with 15 notes
I feel like gay fetishes these days have prerequisites I didn’t take.
Like, Tom of Finland stuff, I got that when I was straight – you like men, so you like big muscles and cocks.
And even the Mad Max leather harnesses I could vibe when I turned bi, I can see how that plays to and with notions of masculinity.
But pup play? Like, maybe if I had been immersed in the Mad Max stuff when it first showed up I could grok the transition and port aspects of my kink over, but coming in fresh it’s like… what?
drdemonprince said: @kontextmaschine it’s overwhelmingly a gay guy thing yes, but I do see plenty of trans girls and cafab trans people pups at the events and furry spaces actually! think it skews men bc dogs are intuitively “boys” in a lot of cis ppls minds and its a masculine kind of submission theoretically. like active, helpful, rugged, not fey etc
k-simplex liked this
imakemyselfanew liked this
vaticotter liked this
pureamericanism liked this
kontextmaschine said:
Well, I’m a cat person, maybe I just lack a rich sense of what it’s like to relate to a submissive dog 
bugger-bhagavan reblogged this from vriskakinnieaynrand and added: i don't have any answers but i don't understand people's incomprehension and bafflement at it. made sense the first time...
- kontextmaschine said:
@drdemonprince I guess part of it is if it’s not about masculinity per se, it’s just weird it’s a specifically gay thing. Like, you don’t see even trans doggirls with the hoods.
max1461 liked this
vriskakinnieaynrand reblogged this from kontextmaschine and added:
the human capacity for language is a great source of problems. so what if you didn't
sabakos liked this nonevahed liked this
space-wizards said: maybe it’s cross pollination from furry stuff?
- kontextmaschine posted this
I feel like gay fetishes these days have prerequisites I didn't take....Like, Tom of...