Dude, who even knows.

27th April 2022

Post reblogged from Kontextmaschine with 94 notes

kontextmaschine:

morlock-holmes:

There’s a PAC in Portland which wants to deal with the Homeless crisis by introducing a ballot measure requiring the city to use 75% of funds dedicated to combatting homelessness for flash building a huge number of shelters, and then giving people the ability to sue the police if they don’t break up homeless encampments.

Which to me seems to be an implicit admission that the shelters you are building are worse to live in then a tent under the freeway overpass.

I mean like, normally a temperature controlled area with a place to put your stuff and not get rained on would be superior to, you know, a doorway, so if you still need police to force people to get out of doorways and underpasses and into your shelter, it feels like that’s a sign to step back and reasses.

Yeah, a few elections ago there was an initiative for some tax on high earners to fund housing but the people pushing it were more pushing a “housing for locals who would be gentrified out”/housing with wrap-around services/get-back-in-the-public-housing-game tip that’s got fairly high cost and lead time per unit created in a way that does not seem poised to really change the “woah there are suddenly a lot of people living in cars or tents on the sidewalk or elsewhere in numbers that can form sizeable Hoovervilles”

Also Portland’s in a federal judicial district whose precedent is it can’t criminalize public camping unless it can promise somewhere to sleep and as it stands it doesn’t have the capacity and until it does can at best sweep rough sleepers out of individual sites (with like a week forewarning)

So the local powers that be, which have really come together since the 2020 election, have decided that as long as there’s gonna be a surtax on the rich they may as well redirect it away from the housing dreamers (in 2020 they also knocked off unreliable councilor Chloe Eudaly, who was kind of owning that not-as-bad-as-SF-but-at-least-not-YIMBY-*blessed* incumbent resident housing angle) to Dealing With The Homeless Crisis as in getting all these encampments gone

Oh also the initiative would require cities in Metro (the metropolitan-area government that consolidates a lot of county functions) to keep camping bans once they get enough shelter slots, on pain of losing all funds, as enforced through a private cause of action for lawsuits

Tagged: portlandportlandportland

  1. cromulentenough reblogged this from morlock-holmes
  2. ninjakittenarmy reblogged this from cthulhubert
  3. cthulhubert reblogged this from shieldfoss
  4. deodatasslawson reblogged this from morlock-holmes
  5. objectivistnerd reblogged this from jenlog
  6. postsforposting reblogged this from morlock-holmes and added:
    arent there laws that say there can only be one union for a given profession? delete that law and viola, you can have a...
  7. starwarsrefs reblogged this from now-phaeton-flier
  8. riversboundtorise reblogged this from theaudientvoid
  9. youzicha said: @morlock-holmes not to be Marxist on main or anything, but I guess if the free housing is acceptable to live in that would reduce peoples motivation to work…
  10. morlock-holmes reblogged this from kontextmaschine and added:
    Right, the problem has been reconceptualized from "It's bad that there are so many homeless people" to "It's bad the...
  11. kontextmaschine reblogged this from kontextmaschine and added:
    Oh also the initiative would require cities in Metro (the metropolitan-area government that consolidates a lot of county...
  12. now-phaeton-flier reblogged this from morlock-holmes
  13. eggorf reblogged this from samosdayoldteeth
  14. firebendinglemur reblogged this from jenlog