Dude, who even knows.
Post reblogged from Opposite over Adjacent with 92 notes
The worst aesthetic problem with Minecraft is that as a building material, wood is objectively worse in all ways than stone, and is just like a thing you do when you’re a bougie gentrifier willing to go to a lot of extra trouble and risk to optimize for appearances. In Minecraft the structurally ideal house is always just made out of stone, which is so unaesthetic!
I guess the problem is that it’s all a byproduct of stone being very easy to clear and carry, but it’s a mining game, so if that weren’t the case it wouldn’t play very well
as a building material, wood is objectively worse in all ways than stone
Wood is much lighter and has a higher tensile strength than stone. If you go without wood, then every place where you would normally use a wooden lintel, beam, or rafter becomes a huge headache. There is nothing structurally ideal about building with 100% stone, which is why it has never been the norm at any time in history.
he said “in Minecraft”, bro
the-question-is-now liked this
rosetintedkaleidoscope reblogged this from kontextmaschine and added: dyed terracotta and concrete. also you can carve stone into patternsbut yeah i do find it annoying that my dream house...
arrogantwerpen liked this Man who isn’t just using mods that give you some option to make your house out of whatever you want aesthetically...
nevichaos liked this
achrilock-atmospheric liked this Use glazed terracotta if you want intricate ornamentation.
smart-elec liked this
biblicaaly-accurate-angel reblogged this from squareallworthy
tyrhinosaurus liked this Mosquecraft
Yeah, I try to dress it up with sandstone and variants, with mixed success.But I love the way the subdued tones look in...
which makes his sniff at “bougie gentrifiers” even *weirder*
intimate-mirror liked this As a side note, and not minecraft, but engineered wood buildings are not particularly flammable (lots of non-flammable...
code-and-cognition liked this
shelleyspeare liked this