Dude, who even knows.
Post reblogged from Kontextmaschine with 2,372 notes
i find the use of the term “witchcraft” when people are discussing actual popular historical magical practices from the early modern or medieval periods of Europe to be vexing and confusing, because the way people use it tends to carry along an ahistorical set of assumptions that has more to do with early neopagan misunderstandings of history than anything else. namely, when people seek ‘witchcraft’ in these time periods they are usually seeking non-christian folk magical practices and beliefs. a big reason this is the case is because early neopagans like Gardner bought into poor scholarship that suggested that during the period of the witch trials there existed sects of surviving pagan practitioners who did magic, and that often these practitioners were the target of the trials. most people seeking historical witchcraft know this was never true, these witch cults did not exist, but the way they use the term witchcraft means they’re ironically basically looking for the mythical practices Gardner and others believed in. why this is especially vexing is that it causes people interested in ‘witchcraft’ to skip entirely over the large corpus of christian magical practices that are decently well documented and were practiced by people in almost every level of society from the bottom to the top. pro-tip you know who was the most prevalent professional magical practitioner in most medieval western European towns, almost certainly even surpassing wise women and other similar folk? the village priest
my-thoughts-and-junk reblogged this from normal-horoscopes
the-starry-eyed-witch reblogged this from zarya-zaryanitsa
lesbian-luciferian liked this
alongingforgod liked this
fierysword reblogged this from vvvoltaire
to-many-towered-camelot reblogged this from skelenabones
alcoholmaenad liked this
to-set-the-stars reblogged this from literallymechanical